SAMPLE REPORT

Evidence-backed Amazon listing audit

This fictional phone-stand example shows how Listnara connects each issue to supplied evidence, explains the consequence, and recommends a bounded next step.

Audit my listing

Listing health

52/100

Biggest opportunity

Conversion readiness

2 high-priority issues

Top actions

1

Add verified minimum and maximum height plus the supported angle range.

These are direct comparison facts requested in the supplied feedback.

low effort

2

Clarify the cable opening dimensions and show a verified charging setup in the copy or images.

The current claim conflicts with a reported use problem.

medium effort

3

State the verified device-size or weight range and explain the stability limit.

Larger-device stability is an unresolved purchase objection.

medium effort

Five dimensions

Where the listing stands

Positioning

61

The product and desk use case are clear, but differentiation is mostly feature-led.

Buyer clarity

48

Important fit, adjustment, and charging details are not specific enough for comparison.

Information quality

43

Several useful claims lack the measurements buyers need to verify them.

Conversion readiness

39

The listing leaves common stability and charging objections unresolved.

Search coverage

70

Core category and compatibility terms are present naturally in the supplied copy.

Issues

Evidence → reasoning → action

high priorityISSUE-1 · Information quality

The height and adjustment range are not stated.

Evidence

customer review

“I wish the product page showed the exact height and adjustment range.”

Why it matters

The supplied review asks for exact height and adjustment information, but the listing provides no measurements. Buyers cannot compare the stand’s viewing range with their desk setup.

What to add

Add verified minimum and maximum height plus the supported angle range.

Expected improvement

Buyers can judge whether the stand fits their desk and viewing position.

high priorityISSUE-2 · conversion

The charging-access claim does not resolve the reported cable problem.

Evidence

bullet 3

“Open design provides easy charging-port access.”

customer review

“The charging cable is difficult to connect while the phone is on the stand.”

Why it matters

The listing promises charging-port access while a supplied review reports difficulty connecting a cable during use. Buyers who charge at their desk may doubt whether the feature works for their setup.

What to add

Clarify the cable opening dimensions and show a verified charging setup in the copy or images.

Expected improvement

The charging-access benefit becomes specific and easier to trust.

medium priorityISSUE-3 · Buyer clarity

Stability expectations for larger phones are unclear.

Evidence

customer review

“It tips backward when I place a larger phone on it.”

Why it matters

A supplied review reports backward tipping with a larger phone, while the listing gives no tested weight or device-size limit. Buyers with larger devices cannot confidently assess stability.

What to add

State the verified device-size or weight range and explain the stability limit.

Expected improvement

Buyers can determine whether their device is within the supported range.

What this audit doesn't know

  • No verified height, angle, cable-opening, device-weight, or stability-test specifications were supplied.
  • No product images were supplied, so visual claims and charging clearance could not be assessed.
  • The audit does not know search volume, ranking, traffic, conversion rate, or competitor performance.

See what your listing fails to explain.

Start with five completed audits each month. No credit card required.

Start free